Direkt zum Hauptbereich

Intelligence for human rights? Private Intelligence Structures in Human Rights Affairs

Under this heading I actually published a new essay about a special intelligence subject. You can read it here:

Intelligence for human rights? Private Intelligence Structures in Human
Rights Affairs, in: Sicherheit und Frieden (S+F), Ausgabe 3-2010, S.
161-168.
(http://www.security-and-peace.de/aktuell.htm#5)

Abstract:
The violation of human rights is a serious crime. Information about it are difficult to obtain and to verify. State intelligence agencies deal with this task only according to instructions of their government and therefore they often ignore or tolerate this breach of international law. Non-state actors, however, can search and document without regard to nation-states. At the present time it appears that most of the necessary information can be acquired by private researchers: Satellite photos, videos about the conflicts, databases, sources on the ground: Private actors can use them for litigable documentary and short campaigns. Commercial private intelligence firms offer more: They can monitor the communication of suspects and track their financial transactions. Today it seems that the necessary information about human rights violations can be obtained and analyzed by private actors – independent from politics.

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Turkish intelligence agencies in troubled times

The Turkish intelligence agencies have various interesting cover organisations and offices in Europe from which they operate. Sometimes these are lobby firms, cultural and language associations, but also think tanks and supposed research institutions. Sometimes they can simply be commercial companies that serve as a cover. In addition, there is a large reservoir of reliable contacts in the diaspora that are always available.  In doing so, the Turkish government is following a successful tactic that has been observed for some time in other states - both enemy and friendly: The structural and geographical outsourcing of intelligence resources and capacities in order to operate effectively from there, i.e. another location. This not only involves outsourcing to non-state actors , but also the relocation of employees of a state intelligence service. This takes them out of the public or media spotlight. In addition - and this applies to Turkey in particular - individual representatives ...

"We didn't know anything about it" - China's espionage in Europe

I read in Intelligence Online that France has apparently now definitely refused a visa to a Chinese researcher. He wanted to take part in a seminar on Tibet that was being held in Paris. Reason: This researcher works at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR). Intelligence Online summarises the reasons for this very comprehensibly: „The CICIR is one of Beijing's oldest and most influential institutes for international research studies, which reports directly to the Ministry of State Security (MSS or Guoanbu)and is supervised by the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).“ In a Wikipedia entry it is formulated even more viciously and clearly:  "The China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations […] is the cover identity of the 11th Bureau of the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS). It is a set of research institutes used as a front to influence foreign diplomats and academics and collect intelligence. Located in Bei...

Spionageziel Berlin

"Am Ende einigten die Alliierten sich darauf, uneinig zu bleiben."  Nein: Das ist nicht das Schlusswort von Olaf Scholz nach der Ukraine Konferenz in der Schweiz, die in paar Tagen stattfinden wird. Könnte allerdings passen. Es ist ein Zitat aus dem sehr lesenswerten Buch " In  geheimer Mission . Als Sonderbeauftragter Roosevelts bei Churchill u.  Stalin  1941 - 1946" von William Averell Harriman  und bezieht sich auf die Konferenz 1945 in Jalta.  Auch heute ist dieses Buch lesenswert, denn es zeigt, wie gravierend das  Zögern und Zaudern auf der einen Seite sich auswirken kann - zum Vorteil der anderen Seite, damals Stalin. Das, was einige Politiker wie Churchill damals ahnten - nämlich dass sich Stalin mittelfristig um keine Abmachungen scheren wird - und was viele der Westalliierten aufgrund kurzfristiger Interessen ignorierten, lässt sich auch heute beobachten: Wie positioniert sich der Westen gegenüber Staaten wie Russland oder China? Wie selbstb...