Direkt zum Hauptbereich

Kim Kyok-sik and the privileged agencies

A few days ago I read an older essay (maybe from 2010), written by a North Korean and titled:

„Attempts To Empowering Kim Jong-Un As Third Generation Successor Will Fail“.

Bad luck, Kim Jon-Un became the new chief in place. More interesting is another headline of his essay, which claims, that „Elites Have Grabbed Economic Power and Are Fighting Among Themselves“. Beside others he mentioned „privileged agencies“ and their greed for power and private wealth. Looking at today developments in North Korea it seems to go like this: Privileged agencies and their members, influential groups with a common history or education, somehow Princelings in a North Korean manner, are fighting for their place.

And maybe the report from Yonhapnews a few days ago about the sacking of Kim Kyok-sik, the minister of the People's Armed Forces, fits in this scenario: He was a hardliner and a hawk, in other words: a permanent harasser in a possible attempt to find a way of in- and outside harmonisation, – without loosing the face. This is only speculation but a optimistic one: The try of more civil groups to change the North Korean society. If those “civil” groups would be more capitalistic than militaristic it will be fine: In the future one can buy them.

Till then the statement in the North Korean´s  essay should be kept in mind: “The successor´s destiny likely will be as fragile as a candle in the wind.”

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Turkish intelligence agencies in troubled times

The Turkish intelligence agencies have various interesting cover organisations and offices in Europe from which they operate. Sometimes these are lobby firms, cultural and language associations, but also think tanks and supposed research institutions. Sometimes they can simply be commercial companies that serve as a cover. In addition, there is a large reservoir of reliable contacts in the diaspora that are always available.  In doing so, the Turkish government is following a successful tactic that has been observed for some time in other states - both enemy and friendly: The structural and geographical outsourcing of intelligence resources and capacities in order to operate effectively from there, i.e. another location. This not only involves outsourcing to non-state actors , but also the relocation of employees of a state intelligence service. This takes them out of the public or media spotlight. In addition - and this applies to Turkey in particular - individual representatives ...

Spionageziel Berlin

"Am Ende einigten die Alliierten sich darauf, uneinig zu bleiben."  Nein: Das ist nicht das Schlusswort von Olaf Scholz nach der Ukraine Konferenz in der Schweiz, die in paar Tagen stattfinden wird. Könnte allerdings passen. Es ist ein Zitat aus dem sehr lesenswerten Buch " In  geheimer Mission . Als Sonderbeauftragter Roosevelts bei Churchill u.  Stalin  1941 - 1946" von William Averell Harriman  und bezieht sich auf die Konferenz 1945 in Jalta.  Auch heute ist dieses Buch lesenswert, denn es zeigt, wie gravierend das  Zögern und Zaudern auf der einen Seite sich auswirken kann - zum Vorteil der anderen Seite, damals Stalin. Das, was einige Politiker wie Churchill damals ahnten - nämlich dass sich Stalin mittelfristig um keine Abmachungen scheren wird - und was viele der Westalliierten aufgrund kurzfristiger Interessen ignorierten, lässt sich auch heute beobachten: Wie positioniert sich der Westen gegenüber Staaten wie Russland oder China? Wie selbstb...

"We didn't know anything about it" - China's espionage in Europe

I read in Intelligence Online that France has apparently now definitely refused a visa to a Chinese researcher. He wanted to take part in a seminar on Tibet that was being held in Paris. Reason: This researcher works at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR). Intelligence Online summarises the reasons for this very comprehensibly: „The CICIR is one of Beijing's oldest and most influential institutes for international research studies, which reports directly to the Ministry of State Security (MSS or Guoanbu)and is supervised by the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).“ In a Wikipedia entry it is formulated even more viciously and clearly:  "The China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations […] is the cover identity of the 11th Bureau of the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS). It is a set of research institutes used as a front to influence foreign diplomats and academics and collect intelligence. Located in Bei...